Which of the following offenses may lead to reasonable suspicion for a Terry frisk?

The offense that may lead to reasonable suspicion for a Terry frisk is auto theft. When law enforcement officers have information indicating that a person may be involved in the commission of a serious crime, such as auto theft, they may have grounds for reasonable suspicion. This suspicion allows them to conduct a limited search, or frisk, of the individual to ensure they pose no immediate danger, particularly if officers have reason to believe the person might be armed.

In the context of Terry v. Ohio, the courts established that reasonable suspicion must be based on specific and articulable facts that criminal activity may be underway, particularly in instances involving crimes that often imply the potential for dangerous behavior. Auto theft is categorized as a more serious offense that could suggest immediate danger, thus justifying a Terry stop and frisk.

Other infractions such as parking violations, speeding, or even noise complaints generally do not carry the same level of immediacy or seriousness that would lead to a reasonable suspicion for a frisk. These offenses are often viewed as minor, and typically do not suggest a heightened risk to the officer or the public that would warrant a full investigation or a protective frisk.